The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) – the federal agency charged with reviewing applications to permit natural gas pipelines – has contended a complaint filed by the Eastern Environmental Law Center (EELC) and Columbia Environmental Law Clinic on behalf of New Jersey Conservation Foundation (NJ Conservation). The complaint states that FERC is acting unconstitutionally by not ensuring that the lands it authorises pipeline companies to seize are being put to a public use.
To read the full article
"FERC’s pipeline approval process is unconstitutional, says NJ Conservation"
Please sign in or become a member for FREE
The first-of-its-kind legal challenge, filed with the US District Court in Trenton against FERC, asks the court to declare that:
- Under its current evaluation process, FERC’s approval process for pipelines violates the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution for improperly taking land from private parties without a public use.
- FERC must consider environmental impacts before granting a pipeline company a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, which allows the companies to exercise eminent domain.
- FERC cannot accept private ‘shipping’ contracts as proof of market demand or as proof that the consumers will not suffer economic harm.
“Our aim is to motivate FERC to amend its policies so the agency ceases its unconstitutional practice of granting certificates for pipelines that are not in the public interest. This will end the unjust seizing of public and private land,” said Susan J. Kraham, Senior Staff Attorney, Columbia Environmental Law Clinic.
The complaint notes that “pipeline parent companies can profit from deals with their […] subsidiaries, and transfer shipments from old pipelines to new pipelines without overall cost savings to consumers. Those parent companies are motivated by the availability of a 14% rate of return on investment that has been consistently awarded by FERC and described by the New Jersey Rate Counsel as ‘tantamount to winning the lottery’.”
Read the article online at: https://www.worldpipelines.com/regulations-and-standards/28112017/fercs-pipeline-approval-process-is-unconstitutional-says-nj-conservation/