Wood Mackenzie: EU carbon storage target falls 35% short

The finding comes from an independent study commissioned by ExxonMobil, OMV Petrom, Shell and TotalEnergies. Wood Mackenzie's analysis measures storage capacity that is fully operational by end 2030, the standard against which the Net Zero Industry Act injection target is assessed. On that basis, the EU faces a position 35% below the 50 million tpy threshold, and the gap widens further once project delays and shortfalls across the broader capture and transport value chain are factored in.

This is the second Wood Mackenzie report for the four companies. Where the October 2025 study focused on storage feasibility, this analysis examines capture, transport and storage as a connected system. “The issues with meeting the NZIA target reflect the challenges of developing a functioning large-scale, cross-border CCS ecosystem from a standing start,” the report states.

The NZIA was designed to break the classic chicken-and-egg deadlock in CCS by mandating storage capacity ahead of confirmed demand. The analysis finds this has produced a different problem where there is an inconsistent approach across the sectors. No single element of the value chain can advance without progress across the others. Less than 6% of targeted NZIA storage capacity is operational or under construction and reaching 50 million tpy would require a five-fold increase in storage final investment decisions between 2026 and 2028, against a base of just 4 million tpy of EU capture capacity that has taken FID and is contractually linked to EU storage.

“Storage developers across Europe are not failing to act, they are being asked to commit capital to projects without the contracted volumes or transport connections that any rational investment decision requires,” said Lisa Gillespie, Director, Energy Consulting at Wood Mackenzie. “The policy has mandated one part of an integrated system while leaving the others to develop at their own pace and through different frameworks. That is the core of the problem. Resolving it requires policy design that addresses the full value chain, not just the storage end of it.”

Four barriers, one system

Value-chain fragmentation leads the list. The hub-based model splits ownership across multiple parties and no component can advance without guarantees from the others. The EU policy framework treats capture, transport and storage as discrete activities rather than interdependent parts of a single system.

The second barrier is insufficient capture supply. The EU capture pipeline totals 36.5 million tpy and planned storage capacity stands at 32.5 million tpy, both short of target. Of the 26 million tpy lacking a confirmed storage solution, 11 million tpy is assessed as potentially stranded, with no proximity to planned pipeline or existing CO₂ infrastructure.

Persistent delay is the third factor. Average overruns across EU storage projects stand at 1.5 years and the trend is worsening.

The fourth barrier is capture economics. Wood Mackenzie’s modelling shows the EU Emissions Trading System price will remain below the levelised cost of CCS for projects approaching FID. The ETS delivers avoided compliance cost rather than concrete revenue, and prices carry both price and political risk.

Key details:

• Projected shortfall: At least 17.5 million tpy, placing the EU 35% below the 50 million tpy NZIA target.
• Storage progress: Less than 6% of targeted NZIA storage capacity is operational or under construction.
• FID requirement: A five-fold increase in storage FIDs required between 2026 and 2028.
• Bankable capture: Only 4 million tpy of EU capture capacity is post-FID and contractually linked to EU storage.
• Stranded risk: 11 million tpy of capture capacity assessed as potentially stranded, concentrated primarily in France and Germany.
• Delays: Average EU storage project delay of 1.5 years; Porthos commissioning now expected second half of 2027, three years behind original schedule.
• Antwerp@C: Over 730 million euros in EU funding received; no FID reached across associated projects.

The report also identifies a mismatch in how obligations and public funding are distributed. NZIA obligations are based on oil and gas production rather than industrial emissions. Some obligated countries have no pre-2031 storage capacity in development and limited EU Innovation Funding. Sweden and Spain received substantial EU Innovation Funding despite holding neither NZIA obligations nor pre-2031 storage capacity. Capture and transport developers face limited regulatory pressure to meet NZIA milestones. Storage operators face legal obligations without the contracted volumes or infrastructure commitments the investment case requires.

Watch highlights from the World Pipelines CCS Forum 2026.

Register your interest for the next World Pipelines CCS Forum. 

Read the article online at: https://www.worldpipelines.com/special-reports/17062026/wood-mackenzie-eu-carbon-storage-target-falls-35-short/