Discussions continue on potential collaborative efforts between NACE International and SSPC
Published by Aimee Knight,
Last month the joint staff and leadership task group from NACE International and SSPC: The Society for Protective Coatings, re-convened to continue discussion of a possible combination of the two organisations. The meeting centred on findings from research and analysis done by McKinley Advisors, the firm serving as a third party, independent advisor helping both organisations resolve potential challenges of a combination such as blending financial structures, cultures, memberships, and other components.
During the meeting, the task force focused on developing a straw model for the NACE-SSPC combination with a focus on corporate and governance structure, aligning key organisational functions, exploring a membership model, and value propositions.
McKinley conducted stakeholder interviews with 25 NACE and 25 SSPC designated individuals. Based on McKinley’s research the leading stakeholder concerns related to the potential loss of relevance or voice in a larger organisation, and whether all certifications of both organisations will continue to be recognised and supported. “If we merge, we will rely on a joint member task force to make recommendations around certifications,” said SSPC President Joe Walker. “The task force would work under a set of parameters focused on allowing certification holders to be grandfathered in and to then recertify into a continuing certification with no financial burden to do so.”
In reviewing the strategic plans of each organisation McKinley found no substantive hurdles that would threaten the proposed consolidation, and the current financial model is sufficient. The legal teams from both organisations presented an overview of possible corporate structures that could provide a suitable framework for a consolidation.
After recommitting to the principle that both existing brands will continue to be protected in the marketplace, the task group discussed a potential membership model for a combined entity and agreed that the best model is one with a hybrid structure that includes corporate and individual membership options and combines the best of both organisations’ value propositions.
“Our members are the lifeblood of our organisations and we agreed that we must work to keep the best of what each organisation offers its members,” said NACE International President Terry Greenfield. “We also agreed that membership tenure of any individuals or corporations will be carried over. And if a member has been involved with both organisations, the longer term of their two memberships would be applied.” Membership staff of both organisations are now developing a draft structure based on the feedback from the meeting.
A significant portion of the meeting was devoted to developing a straw model for governance with emphasis on the need to ensure adequate representation for the contractor and international member constituencies. Also discussed was the importance of enabling member leaders to serve out the remainder of their terms, and whether leadership roles and responsibilities would change in any way.
The task group is completing remaining research into considerations raised during the September meeting and will reconvene again in person in early 2020. In the meantime, bi-monthly task group calls will continue. Following the next meeting, information will be shared with members of both organisations and the Board of SSPC will vote during its first quarter meeting on 1 February 2020. NACE International’s Board will vote at its first meeting of the year on 14 March 2020 and then the members of both organisations will be asked to vote on or about 1 April 2020.
Read the article online at: https://www.worldpipelines.com/regulations-and-standards/23102019/discussions-continue-on-potential-collaborative-efforts-between-nace-international-and-sspc/
You might also like
Record depths of liquidity across natural gas markets
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. announces record levels of liquidity across its US natural gas markets as customers manage price risk.